Skip to content

Conversation

@davidnuescheler
Copy link

it seems that the license on the repo is seen as "Other" by GitHub and is not viewed as actually intended as "MIT".

i think there may be two problems coming from existance of the COPYRIGHT file and possibly from the specific wording in the LICENSE which doesn't conform exactly with the License template in GitHub.

...not sure if this is helpful, but i thought i'd PR it anyway.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants